The word of the day is "TACKLE"
Aug. 4th, 2005 09:33 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
SEATTLE, Washington (AP) -- A woman was arrested Wednesday for attempting to open an airplane exit door while the plane was still in the air, police said.
The 52-year-old woman from Dania Beach, Florida, left her seat and tried to open the door as the United Airlines flight was descending into Seattle to land, police said. The plane was at an altitude of about 4,000 feet at the time.
She failed but "did manage to turn the handle far enough that a warning light went on in the cockpit," Seattle-Tacoma International Airport spokesman Bob Parker told KING-TV.
A flight attendant persuaded the woman to sit back down, but nobody physically restrained her. Parker said the other passengers stayed belted in their seats in case she did manage to open the door.
The woman was arrested for investigation of malicious mischief when the plane landed. Police were investigating whether alcohol and prescription medication were involved.
Sorry, I see anyone trying to pry a door open in mid-flight, and I'm leaping on them. Anyone? Bueller?
no subject
Date: 2005-08-04 01:39 pm (UTC)Thanks for the article though.. it does make you wonder. And how to people not notice someone is trying to open a door until the warning light goes off in the cockpit?
no subject
Date: 2005-08-04 01:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-04 01:45 pm (UTC)hehehe, though I'd really like to see you get to her in 3 seconds or less and give her that BIG HUG ;) I'd probably pay to see it.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-04 01:57 pm (UTC)Anyway, my two cents is that at cruising altitude I'd go for a tackle too because seats, let alone seatbelts could come loose from that kind of depressurization, and also on ascent because messing with the slipstream under full thrust and high angle-up is a Bad Thing, but on descent I'd just stay belted in and treat it as a self-correcting problem.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-04 02:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 12:32 am (UTC)(Probably too slow a leak to be an issue, but still....)
no subject
Date: 2005-08-04 02:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-04 02:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-04 02:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-04 03:02 pm (UTC)re: excuse
Date: 2005-08-04 04:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-04 04:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-04 05:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-04 05:22 pm (UTC)ha
Date: 2005-08-04 05:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-04 07:26 pm (UTC)